The way education is delivered and organised has evolved throughout history. From traditional approaches that emphasise teacher-centred instruction and content delivery to more progressive approaches that prioritise student-centred learning and real-world application, curriculum design and implementation have changed significantly over time.
Let’s meet two teachers to understand the difference between the two approaches.
Ms T is a teacher who follows the traditional curriculum. She uses content-based instruction. She delivers a lecture on the history of the American Civil War, with students taking notes and answering questions based on the textbook. She uses standardised assessments. Her students take a multiple-choice test on the content covered in the lecture, with Ms T grading and ranking the results. Then, she believes in textbook-based learning. Her students read chapters in a history textbook and answer questions at the end of each chapter. Finally, she is focussed on classroom routines and structure. Ms T establishes a routine where students start each class by reviewing the agenda for the day and setting learning goals. This routine helps set expectations and establish a sense of structure, which can help students feel more comfortable and engaged in the learning process. Additionally, Ms T has a consistent system for organising materials and assignments, such as a class folder or online platform, to help students stay organised and on-task.
Ms P is a teacher who follows the progressive curriculum. She believes in the real-world application of learning. So, she leads a discussion on current events related to civil rights issues and having students work in groups to research and present on a related topic. She conducts authentic assessments. Her students create a multimedia presentation or video on the topic, showcasing their research and understanding in a creative and original way. Then, she ensures project-based learning. Her students work on a longer-term project, such as researching a local civil rights issue and presenting a proposal for change to the school board or city council. Since Ms P is flexible and adaptable, she uses student feedback to adjust and modify lessons based on student interests and needs, rather than following a strict curriculum plan.
Both the teachers are efficient performers and ensure learner success and achievement. The only difference in their teaching and learning process is their approach.
Here is an overview of traditional and progressive curriculum approaches to help you determine which one might work best for your students.
Both traditional and progressive curriculum approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and teachers must consider the needs and goals of their students when determining which approach to use. While the traditional one may be more effective for imparting content knowledge, the progressive approach may better equip students with the skills and mindset necessary for success in the real world. Ultimately, the goal of any curriculum is to provide students with the knowledge and skills necessary for success, both in and outside of the classroom.
If you want to dive deeper into this area of teaching and learning, please feel free to check out our course on Curriculum Design and Development.
